|
Post by strontiumdog on Apr 12, 2009 1:23:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ]UBC[ Igor on Apr 15, 2009 14:35:56 GMT
SD, this site is full of crap click the link and check yourself. was it an embush to infect my computer and prevent me to kick your quake ass??
|
|
|
Post by strontiumdog on Apr 15, 2009 14:57:33 GMT
was it an embush to infect my computer and prevent me to kick your quake ass?? No embush needed to kick your ass HEHE Link seems to be ok to me (maybe French servers can't link to British .org sites?) Wanted to see if the NASA scientist could work this one out cos I haven't a clue how it can predict it?
|
|
|
Post by abercrab on Apr 15, 2009 15:59:03 GMT
The formula they have you use always results in one of a small group of possible results. They just keep changing the symbol that they give to that group of numbers so that it always seems it is predicting whatever your original guess led to.
|
|
|
Post by strontiumdog on Apr 15, 2009 21:20:22 GMT
It's obviously got someway of predicting the result, I just can't work out how it's soo accurate? I've tried a few times now and it always gets it right How??
|
|
|
Post by abercrab on Apr 15, 2009 22:47:46 GMT
Ok, after crunching a couple of numbers, here's a more complete answer to how it works.
The formula they have you use always gives an answer that is a multiple of 9. So the only possible numerical answers are 9, 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, 63, 72, and 81. When they ask you to look for your anwer and remember the associated symbol, check out all of the symbols next to the above numbers, they will always have matching symbols so no matter what you do they have ensured that the symbol they pick matches your results.
|
|
|
Post by strontiumdog on Apr 16, 2009 1:02:06 GMT
OMG Thanks Abe ;D Knew it had to be something simple, just my brain couldn't work it out You ain't a school teacher Abe? are you
|
|
|
Post by abercrab on Apr 16, 2009 1:16:08 GMT
You ain't a school teacher Abe? are you Nope, but I have an engineering degree so I've had plenty of math and science.
|
|